Skip to main content

LAB Metadecidim -Session 5- Gobernanza democrática de infraestructuras digitales público-comunes

Lugar :
Campus UPF (Poble Nou) Edifici Roc Boronat C/Roc Boronat, 138, Barcelona (Sala 52.217 (Planta 2)
Fecha :
Currently, the Decidim project is in a period of defining the governance structures and processes that will allow the Metadecidim community to decide on the platform, on its multiple layers and dimensions (from the data policies to the rules of use, from the functionalities to the democratic guarantees of its deployment), starting with the software, in the medium and long term. As public-common infrastructure (ie, public financing, participatory design and democratic governance), Decidim is presented as a model opposed to the corporate Facebook or Google. Also, being a political network, the nature of its contents and structures is qualitatively different from that of Wikipedia: the objective is not the collaborative construction of a repository of information and knowledge but decisions, intelligences and collective actions that could go from production of laws, strategic plans, or budgets to the self-organization and collective action of social organizations. In this context, the challenge for this session of the LAB.metadecidim is to discuss and outline a model of democratic governance for Decidim.
Challenge to debate:
  • What actors, structures, processes, devices and guarantees are necessary to build a democratic democratic governance of Decidim?
Guiding questions:
  • What models of platform governance exist?
  • What should we understand by "democratic governance" of a digital infrastructure?
  • What models are there? What cases can serve as a reference?
  • Which could be the actors, the structures, the processes and the necessary devices to promote a democratic decision-making governance?
  • What layers (software licenses, data policies, usage rules, interface design, types of processes) and dimensions (economic, political, technological, institutional-bureaucratic, etc.) should be taken into account when articulating this governance ?
  • What legal forms would they have?
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of a democratic platform governance?

Más información

09:30h - 09:40h: Presentación del reto. Equipo lab.metadecidim
09:40h - 09:55h: ”Wanna see your OSS project succeed? Nurture your community”, Jordi Cabot, ICREA Research professor at UOC
09:55h - 10:15h: “Drupal: the drop is always moving. Autogestión y gobernanza de infraestructuras digitales en comunidades de procomún”, Cristina Chumillas, Miembro; David Rozas, Investigador en la Universidad de Surrey (Reino Unido) y miembro del Centre for Research in Social Simulation
10:15h - 10:30h: “Modelos de gobernanza de software libre en la administración pública: caso Sentilo”, Malcolm Bain, Socio ID Lawpartners
10:30h - 10:45h: Preguntas Fila 0. Toni Hermoso, Miembro Wikimedia Bcn; Alícia Mullor, Facilitadora de grupos, El Camino del Elder; Ulises, Fundador El Camino del Elder; Sebastià Vila, Delegado Rector Política TIC de la UPC; Víctor Fernández de Alba, Miembro de la dirección Plone Foundation
10:45h - 11:30h: Debate con las personas asistentes

Plain text

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Escribe la primera letra de "tecnopolitica" en mayúscula.
Answer this question to verify that you are not a spam robot.